Author: Joey

  • What is happening?

    What is happening?

    “What is happening?” is always a funny question to ask.

    Whatever the situation, there will be layers to it, and nothing exposes those layers quicker than asking this simple question and giving it a little thought.

    Giving things a little thought is not quite how things are working these days though. And considering that things aren’t working well these days, in actuality, we as a species need to acknowledge how slow we are being in fully processing that information, because it only further delays our cogent response.

    But maybe together we can crack into this idea a little further, looking at an area where humanity might be undermining itself the most presently.

    In thinking about what is happening in any given “right now”, consider the following one-player scenario…

    All day we receive signals from our environment.

    In the real world, you receive signals and can trace their origin.

    I’m hearing construction sounds this morning and am able to go look down the street at the house they just knocked down to build a new one, and there I can see the people who will be hammering into my head all day long.

    That is not the situation when you are receiving signals from a phone.

    On your phone, you do not now know the source of many signals you receive.

    Additionally, the nature and motive of these signals are not always clear either, nor their boundaries, because the real world and your real life are still very much in play even if the geography of your inputs spans the globe.

    But most of these signals start off innocently enough…

    Part of the issue here is, we are not just getting “content” from our devices anymore.

    In terms of polished and professional material, we’ve been largely robbed of the level of quality that used to qualify as content and had it replaced with anyone and everyone’s hot and cold takes of everything, where the gossip and mean remarks people used to have to whisper in the shadows can stand right next to the propaganda and stupidity that used to struggle to infect the masses, but that now can do so from center stage.

    In many cases, we don’t know the who, what, or why behind the communications we receive. Yet reading what we are reading and seeing what we are seeing is directly resulting in how we are going out in the world acting as we are acting.

    Human culture is clearly not mature enough to handle what we have wrought on ourselves, so we get this instead…

    If only it were that straight forward.

    If only it were that diversified.

    If only there weren't algorithms warping space and time on our phone such that people all around the globe have the chance of walking on the wrong side of town without leaving their home.

    The pathways to bad places have never been so paved and well-lit.

    And if you are wondering why your control is hitting the ball back toward a phone that doesn't care... now you are making the connection that counts.

    Your phone doesn't care, and that could be a reason to ask why you care so much.

    Because though it might not be interested in what you think, don't lose sight of the fact that your phone is very much paying attention. It's learning every day about you and your connection to the world, whether you are or not.

    What can be done with that information playing right back at you via some app is what our phones care about, and it is a far more expansive proposition than anyone ever responsibly considered.

    That responsibility has fallen to each of us individually, hence the need to ask "what is happening?" more often when we are looking at our phones.

    We are at a dramatic disadvantage with the technical power lighting up the screens in front of us.

    We are being computed and used.

    We are fish in its barrel.

    And for what? ... Everything and nothing at once.

    For... is the point not to overwhelm you?

    ... Are you overwhelmed?

    Because you are certainly distracted.

    The real game might be more something like this...

    Though it is not made clear in the game, you have just lost.

    Though it is not made clear in the game, you have just lost.

    Though it is not made clear in the game, you have just lost.

    ...

    Thanks for (realizing you are) playing!

    ...

    Next time we'll take it in a different direction. This was supposed to be a post about mental competence and current events. Anyway, until then, ...

    Shameless plug...

    If you are interested in more of my negative take on smartphones, check out the best-selling You and Your Phone are Boring over at The Papercuts Library!

  • A labor force without context

    A labor force without context

    What are we laboring for?

    When we talk about people “working,” what does it all mean?

    Work seems such a central part of life, when it could be seen as more of a phase.

    Because in terms of any given day, “working” is only a condition for a portion of the population.

    In fact, the first point to make here is, on any given day, most people are not working.

    Why does it matter? Well, for one, we call it the workweek. Five days of reality out of every seven are, in general terms, dedicated to work. So when you see a traffic jam, it is easy to mistake it for the whole world trying to get to work at the same time, but the reality is that the working world is just part of the story and that school only covers part of that remainder.

    Not everyone is participating in a five day a week grind.

    It is more important to note than it would seem too, because in general, working people can be judged and treated quite harshly despite the active and critical role they play in our society.

    Most easily seen in the case of single parents, society does not account for the way the economic load lands on many people’s shoulders.

    People working are actively trying to make a living, where “making a living” is shorthand for having the money to maintain a livelihood, where we are literally talking about roofs over heads and food on tables.

    It lies in stark contrast to “living,” and in fact lies in opposition to life, because the truth is many people are not successfully making a living within our economy.

    No one wants to talk about that however, so we act like the unemployment numbers are telling us something when the real situation is far more wide-spread and nuanced.

    To illustrate this better, let’s get some numbers on the board:

    Employment stats are usually only presented within the bounds of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population, but by including the entire population in our view, we can clearly see that the Employed are slightly outnumbered by the “Non-employed.”

    But let’s make that even clearer with the percent shares:

    Now the concept of “making a living” becomes a little more complex.

    Who are all these people not working and how are they getting away with it?

    Kids and the retired are in that number, but to what degree?

    Put another way, how many people not working are depending on someone Employed to make their living for them?

    Those answers await us when we get to household data, where reality really begins to take shape.

    For now, let’s focus on this Employed lot:

    So in thinking about the difference between now and the 1960s, the proportion has gone from roughly ~35% Employed, ~35% Kids, ~30% Other to ~50% Employed, ~20% Kids, ~30% Other.

    Oh how our demographics have churned.

    We are creating fewer participants for the future while more of our present stock is stuck working.

    It doesn’t feel like a brighter future.

    My general thesis is that our civilization is operating without a point and therefore our lives become afterthoughts in the wake of those driven to “win.”

    We aren’t trying to make great lives possible, we just pass on the outlandish notion that everyone can do it on their own despite conditions making it increasingly difficult for both individuals and families to make ends meet.

    Things aren’t what they seem at all, and yet we call it the news and then call it a day, setting up nothing but more of the same for tomorrow.

    For the moment though, let’s let those proportion sink in. That’s the world we live in now.

    The next step will be dissecting the wild variations among the “Employed,” for it is a range of opportunities being presented and a wider range of outcomes, which is where so many of us fall through the cracks.

  • On Economic Exploration

    On Economic Exploration

    If you read The Civilian Noninstitutional Population post, you might have wondered… where is all of this coming from?

    Why is this guy talking about economics, and why should I bother reading it?

    Well, this new series of posts I’ve started are directly picking back up on economic studies I developed back in 2008-2011 as part of my conceptual art think tank, Ape Con Myth.

    View into my second studio (dubbed the John Nash studio) in Red Hook, Brooklyn.
    The pie charts on the door and wall are United States national economic account data.

    My story of working with data goes back much further though.

    I was fascinated by numbers at an early age.

    But far from being able to claim any understanding of it, I think initially I might have been drawn to finance simply from the daily stock market report flashing numbers with strange abbreviations in front of me.

    I didn’t know what any of it meant, but it looked like fun, and thanks to shows like Family Ties and movies like Wall Street, the mirage of the markets got me out the door, to New York City and business school.

    As it went though, I was disillusioned by the whole thing on the first day of Economics 101.

    All it took was seeing the supply and demand curves for me to think better of it all.

    Supply and demand are too easily manipulated for it to be the basis of so much, especially when it comes to the way we make our living and attempt to survive.

    Ironically, it was leaving business school to study dramatic writing and literature that eventually led me back to my own study of economics, as I literally and figuratively struggled with the concept of making a living firsthand.

    That was ultimately the genesis of Ape Con Myth, which operated under the header: “the struggle for survival is an incredible waste of time.”

    This was my setup for an open studio day in Red Hook back in 2009. We’ve got personal consumption expenses in the top left pie, the Dow Jones in the top right, and the green dip you see in the bottom right corner image is government spending during World War II.

    The premise that we are wasting our lives trying to make a living has only grown more concrete in my mind, from both personal experience and paying attention to the world around me.

    Look at us. Look at this mess. We aren’t even trying to make it easier on ourselves.

    Supply and demand are getting the best of us all, and it warps the spacetime of our lives every day.

    That is in effect why I’m here. That is why everything you see on this site is happening.

    We needlessly suffer and struggle. I don’t think it has to be like that.

    What do you think?

  • The Civilian Noninstitutional Population

    The Civilian Noninstitutional Population

    This is one of my favorite concepts in United States’ economic data.

    It cuts right to the inhumanity of it all.

    Who is part of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population (CNP)?

    Well, if you are at least sixteen years of age, not in the military, and not living in an institutional facility, … you are!

    Why do we split it up as such?

    It always feels like a dodge to me. When navigating this type of data, there are always these little exceptions that muddy the water, technically true and relevant, but with some dampening effect to the clarity and impact of the associated concepts.

    In that regard, CNP represents one of many obstacles to a basic understanding of the U.S. economy.

    Take for instance recent headlines about drops in the labor force. It doesn’t sound good, but the media perpetually throws out numbers without the context needed to understand them.

    This is the beginning of a series of posts attempting to establish that context.

    First we will consider the finite set of the U.S. population.

    To find our labor force and understand its drop, this first cut divides our resident population by availability to join the labor force, which is basically what the Civilian Noninstitutional Population represents.

    And yes, “Everyone Else” is overwhelmingly children (~94%), plus those in the military and institutions.

    Notice anything funny about Everyone Else?

    It has not been growing. Look at that timeline. In 1970 there were 67.9 million in the Everyone Else bucket versus a projected 68.2M in 2025, which is 0.4% growth for the period.

    Over the same time, the Civilian Noninstitutional Population has roughly doubled from 137.2M to 273.8M, or 99.6% change overall.

    What happened? Or what didn’t happen?

    It would seem the widely publicized “baby boom” has been followed by a long, slow baby bust.

    The baby boom’s impact peaked in this regard back in 1962.

    Was the youth culture of the 1960s literally driven by the power of numbers?

    It would seem then that the 1970s was not just a coming of age story for that lot, but one for the country as a whole as it began shifting to a heavier mix of adults, which has continued into the present.

    Projected at 80% as of 2025, the CNP now outnumbers Everyone Else by 4 to 1, up from the 3 to 1 ratio breached in the 1980s.

    If it feels less fun around here, you now know one more reason why.

    And since the rest of this journey mainly focuses on breaking down CNP, let’s answer the question begging to be answered and quantify the kids in this story while we are here.

    Line chart of the U.S. resident population under age 16, in millions, 1948–2025. It rises from 40.1 million in 1948 to a baby-boom peak of 62.9 million in 1966, falls to 55.0 million in 1982, recovers to a second peak of 65.4 million in 2010, and drifts down to 63.2 million by 2025.

    There’s your baby boom. From 40M kids to 60M in a little over a decade. It has basically been flat since, with a dip in the 1970-80s making it a little less unnerving to see that number sliding again now.

    2025 America had basically the same number of kids as in 1966, except kids today have to deal with twice as many adults.

    So it has gone.

    Later we will get to the household data that might connect those kids with the adults dropping out of the labor force.

    Next however we will break down the Civilian Noninstitutional Population into parts.

    What percentage of those available to work are working? Who needs work and doesn’t have it? And how do those populations fit into the whole?

  • Creating in a laboratory of one’s self

    Creating in a laboratory of one’s self

    To create… well, with my brand of creation at least, … it is like working in a laboratory of one’s self.

    I am here this morning surrounded by all my lab equipment, my past work, and my active experiments, which take the form of the files and windows open and stored on all these computers, the papers on the wall and in all these boxes and drawers, and all the things swirling around in my head that haven’t made it out yet.

    It is a wonderland.

    But in the larger scope of things, there is always my life, which impacts the disposition and flow in this lab.

    Time spent is the precious commodity, and what I have to spend it on often overwhelms and displaces what I would like to spend it on.

    Everything goes in phases though.

    This is a self-conscious one for me.

    A time of renewal and recalibration.

    It’s not the first time I’ve been here. I know this place because it usually coincides with me returning to the Tao Te Ching.

    D.C. Lau’s 1963 translation is my preferred version, and it begins…

    The way that can be spoken of
    Is not the constant way;
    The name that can be named
    Is not the constant name.

    As a generalist, I have had an easier time connecting with these two simple yet daunting concepts that stand at the beginning of this work.

    For someone who somewhat needs and seems to thrive in a basic routine, my every day, every week, and every month are nothing but different. It doesn’t matter how consistent the schedule is, the experience is never the same. Even when I like and particularly note a pattern, I cannot seem to repeat it.

    But I’ve been reading those words above over and over again since high school and I do like to think that part of my operating system has been written with them in mind.

    Who can keep up with the ideas that are actually sticking over time though?!

    The nameless was the beginning of heaven and earth;
    The named was the mother of the myriad creatures.

    These two lines are easy to pass over, perhaps because of the rug that they pull out from under us, said myriad creatures. We didn’t come with names, we were given them.

    We have given names to everything we could think to name, while not knowing what we were missing.

    And that’s where these next two lines come in. They identify the self-conscious moment I’m in right now…

    Hence always rid yourself of desires in order to observe its secrets;
    But always allow yourself to have desires in order to observe its manifestations.

    There is it. The precious moment I’m having is being rid of any specific desires for a moment.

    “Allowing” myself to have desires is not often a choice, once an idea takes hold.

    The Papercuts Library is in effect a tunnel I’m emerging from after nearly seven years.

    So many forces shaped the reasoning that led me there. And as a vehicle, it has served me well in its purpose. … It is not going away either. … However I am in the midst of shifting my creative center of gravity.

    I have long preferred not to utilize this website for reasons we will be exploring along the way, but for the moment, suffice to say, I’m stepping out of the vehicle of a book series and into the vehicle of myself.*

    My laboratory … or whatever this existence is and represents.

    But sitting here without desire, I am observing the secrets of The Way. … And I’m trying to learn what I can, while I can, because I know soon enough an idea will take hold and I will be off on my merry and directed way toward a new destination, observing its manifestations.

    What I haven’t cracked yet is the end of this first chapter:

    These two are the same
    But diverge in name as they issue forth.
    Being the same they are called mysteries,
    Mystery upon mystery –
    The gateway of the manifold secrets.

    So you are never without The Way, whether driven mad by desire or sitting there like a rock.

    This faucet is always on.

    Being aware of that is the key, and the challenge.

    There are eighty more chapters to this amazing work if you are interested in being challenged as such.

    I cannot recommend it more.

    In my copy you can still see the six or so lines I highlighted back in high school. They were the only ones I felt I understood at the time.

    Even now, I wouldn’t necessarily claim to understand any of it, while also feeling that I am helplessly living it in more ways than I’ve ever noticed or imagined.

    It’s that kind of thing.

    You can’t put a name on it.

    Embrace that.

    *It’s all in the packaging, folks.

    There it is, you don’t even need the rest of the book.